http://snugs45.livejournal.com/ (
snugs45.livejournal.com) wrote in
rsl_fans2016-02-10 02:30 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
Thanks to Amy for all her hard work.
Here's another review (had to make a separate post kept getting spam message).
http://www.vulture.com/2016/02/theater-review-prodigal-son.html
There is this interesting bit at near the bottom:
Robert Sean Leonard as Hoffman does as much as possible with a character who doesn’t make much sense to us because Shanley, still seeing his teacher through a teenager’s eyes, cannot make sense of him either. That being the case, and knowing from the play that Hoffman, before he died, specifically asked Shanley not to write about him, I wonder whether this material was ill served, not just theatrically but morally, by its fully autobiographical treatment
I find it frustrating that the writer makes a statement and then leaves it hanging for us to contemplate any possible reasons. I wonder if those who've seen the play have any thoughts on this?
Posting this here as edit can't seem to add to list so will also add any other I find here. Please
discofunction add to your original list
Have now deleted reviews that have been added to
discofunction original list.
Will post any new ones I find any here.
Here's another review (had to make a separate post kept getting spam message).
http://www.vulture.com/2016/02/theater-review-prodigal-son.html
There is this interesting bit at near the bottom:
Robert Sean Leonard as Hoffman does as much as possible with a character who doesn’t make much sense to us because Shanley, still seeing his teacher through a teenager’s eyes, cannot make sense of him either. That being the case, and knowing from the play that Hoffman, before he died, specifically asked Shanley not to write about him, I wonder whether this material was ill served, not just theatrically but morally, by its fully autobiographical treatment
I find it frustrating that the writer makes a statement and then leaves it hanging for us to contemplate any possible reasons. I wonder if those who've seen the play have any thoughts on this?
Posting this here as edit can't seem to add to list so will also add any other I find here. Please
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Have now deleted reviews that have been added to
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
Will post any new ones I find any here.
no subject
I'm really on the fence about seeing this now. A play centered on a 15-year-old boy doesn't hold much interest for me in the first place. Add to that the (seeming) self-indulgence of the playwright and ... Eh.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
I haven't had chance to properly read the reviews as the kids are home and keeping me busy. But scanning briefly, they seem a bit luke warm. I didn't see anything negative but it doesn't look like it wowed either. The critics do seem to find RSL very capable though.
no subject
Watch the online previews instead. I'm glad I got to see him in person (yummy) but only go if you NEED to.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Thanks for all your help
(no subject)
(no subject)